Cambridge Catalogue  
  • Help
Home > Catalogue > Governance for the Environment

Details

  • 4 tables
  • Page extent: 300 pages
  • Size: 228 x 152 mm
  • Weight: 0.6 kg

Hardback

 (ISBN-13: 9780521519380)

Governance for the Environment
Cambridge University Press
9780521519380 - Governance for the Environment - New Perspectives - Edited by Magali A. Delmas and Oran R. Young
Index

Index

abatement, first-best level of 62

Accelerated Reduction and Elimination of Toxics (ARET) Challenge 56, 155, 158–159, 160, 168, 169, 172, 175–176

accidents and spills, and perception of an industry 103–104

accountability 32, 122

activism 127–128, 132, 133

actors, asymmetric power relationship among 86–89

adaptation to global climate change 92–93

adverse selection, in self-regulation programs 107–109, 112

advertising, brand name 104

advocacy NGOs 131

strategies and tactics of 132

agenda-setting 133–134

agriculture

“green,” 232

organic 204–206

sustainable 206

Ahold company 207

air pollution 158

Alcoa 56

alliance capitalism 126

Alternative Trade Organizations 202

Amazon basin, protection of 133

American Chemistry Council 160

American Forest and Paper Association 195

American Political Science Association 70

Angola 199

Antarctica 23

anti-corporate activism 127–128, 132

apparel industry 214

Aristotle 36

Arnold, Matt 98

associative networks 89

authority

decentralization of 75–76

and good governance 32

governmental vs. private 122

of NSMDs 187–189

battery industry 103

Becker, Gary 44, 46

Belgium 200, 204

best management practices (BMPs) 195

“beyond compliance” principles 161, 234

Bhopal disaster 59, 104, 111, 160

biodiversity 192

birds 206

Bob, Clifford 134

“boiling in oil” contracts 47

boomerang model of activism 133

boycotts

failure of 192

NGO-initiated 59, 102, 189

boycott shield 193

B&Q company 194

Brazil 197, 199, 200, 202

Britain 126, 204, 205

British Petroleum (BP) 26, 29, 128

Brundtland Report 81

Buchanan, James 54

Bunting, Bruce 210

business.

See companies, corporations

Café Audubon 206

Cafédirect 203

CAFOD 204


California 50, 205

California Fuel Cell Partnership 91

Canada 63, 155, 156, 159–160, 195

Canadian Council of Forest Ministers 195–196

Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) 159

Canadian Standards Association (CSA) 195

Canadian Sustainable Forestry Certification Coalition 195

carbon emissions 17, 24, 123, 166

carbon taxes 91

carbon tetrachloride 158

carbon trading 50, 92, 138

Caribbean countries 206

carrot-and-stick approach 47–48

Carson, Rachel, Silent Spring 103, 205

cartels and clubs 107, 111

case studies, use of, in economics 47

Center for Science and the Environment 51

Central America Coffee Company 207

CERES principles 8, 103

certification programs 51–52, 65, 183, 187, 190–192, 202–208, 210–213

environmental type 204–207

future of 213–215

NSMD type 183, 190–192, 202–208, 214–215

possible scenarios for 190–192

socially responsible type 202–204

chemical industry 100, 107, 160–161

voluntary programs in 56, 59, 104

Chemical Manufacturers Association 160

Chicago Climate Exchange 8

Chile 197

China 35, 64

chlorofluorocarbons 64, 99

Christian Aid 204

civil society

global 27, 81

governance by agents of (e.g., NGOs) 7, 26–28, 141

networks, increasing prominence of 27

unequal power of, compared to state and corporations 86–87

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 50, 59, 158, 166

Climate Challenge Program 103, 155, 157, 160, 170, 176, 225

climate change.

See global climate change

climate change programs 159–160, 169

Climate Leaders 48, 60

climate system, research on 35

Climate Wise program 155, 158, 160, 176

Coase, Ronald 43

codes of conduct

effectiveness of, in mitigating environmental damage 109

voluntary 8

coercion

in environmental governance 47–49

transaction costs of 48

coffee 198–208

environmental problems from 198

fair trade 207–208

importing countries 200

organic 205–207, 208

price volatility and 198–199, 200–202

producing countries 199–208

Coffee America 207

Collection, Fishing, and Holding standard (CFH) 211

collective action, problems of 15–18

Colombia 199, 201

colonial period 88

co-management 79

command-and-control regulations 50

common-pool resources 63, 100, 102

communities, in hybrid environmental governance 77–80

companies

boundaries of, in a global economy 126

compared to NGOs 135–137

compliance with environmental regulations 52–53, 77

correlation of financial and social performance 67

desire for stable regulatory rules 7, 25

in domestic politics 128

dysfunction in 136

environmental goals of, self-chosen 162–163

environmental harm caused by 137

environmental standards set by 137

governance of, shareholder vs. stakeholder interests in 126

governance role of 24–26

“green,” 98–99, 181, 230

information from 232–235

internal politics of 124

and international environmental governance 82, 124–130

and NGOs 120

non-market strategies of 58–60, 125–129

organization of 141

power of, relative to states and NGOs 135–137, 139

public vs. private 122

research on 142

responding to normative principles 224

stonewalling by, to avoid change in behavior 127

structural power of, to make investments 136–137

symbolic strategies of 145, 225

targeting of specific ones, by activists and NGOs 59, 67, 189

See also corporations

compare-and-combine governance mechanisms 235–236

compliance

based on enforcement threats 86

business motivations for 52–53, 167–168

good record of, and profits 53

Connecticut 52

Conservation Fund 99

consumers

“green,” 57, 65, 77, 232

information available to 224, 231–232

coral reefs, destruction of 209

corporate social responsibility (CSR) 25, 77, 127, 128, 183

corporations

corporate governance, shareholder vs. stakeholder interests in 126

in domestic politics 128

global agenda of 82

governance role of 24–26, 82

and international environmental governance 124–130

structural power of, from ability to make investments 136–137

See also companies, multinational corporations

corruption 5

Costa Rica 108, 201

countries

corporatist structure of many in Europe and Japan 61

unequal power relations between 87–88

See also nation states

credence goods 105

crime, and punishment 47

cyanide use in capturing fish 209–210, 213

Czech Republic 197

decision-making, supranational, national, and local levels of 83–84

Demeter Bund 205

democracy 32, 87

in environmental governance 82

Denmark 204

Department of Energy, US (USDOE) 48, 67, 158, 160, 223, 225

deregulation 22, 26

developing countries

democratic reform in 87

and developed countries 87–88

elites in 88–89

environmental governance in 67–68

instrument choice in 52

officials’ relationship with citizens in 89

suppliers in, held to environmental standards 65

voluntary programs in 52, 228–229

direct action, NGO-initiated 189

distributive effects of governance 34

Dupont 29, 56

Earth Island Institute 102

eco-labels 51, 108, 115, 193, 206, 222, 223, 231–232

competing, confusion from 232

Ecological Trading Company 193

economics

assumptions of maximizing behavior, market equilibrium, and stable preferences 45

testing of theories 46–47, 64

Eco-OK 207

Ecosystem and Fishery Management standard (EFM) 211

ecosystems

degradation of 93–95

human-dominated, and demand for governance 19, 39

services of, to humans 17, 93

effectiveness.

See environmental performance

efficiency gains 181

electric utilities 51, 103, 155

Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 51

emissions

baseline of 173

permits 50, 52

Energy Policy Act of 1992 159

Energy Star label 223

England, mid-seventeenth century 12

Enron 126

entry requirements

barriers 15

lack of, and failure of self-regulation 107

strict 108

Environmental Defense Fund 29, 55, 56, 99

environmental economics 47–68

mainstream 49

research in 65–68

environmental governance

coercive power lacking in 47–49

comparative efficiency of alternative forms of 224–227, 235–236

cooperation of state, market, and community actors 95

defined 71–73

demand for and supply of 43

democracy in 82

in developing countries 67–68

government role in 227–228

hybrid forms of 69–70

micro and macro levels of 65

political aspects of 62–63, 69–97

pressures for change in 74–77

reasons for participating in 232

research in 221–238

self interest as motive for participating in 80

successful mechanisms of 228–229

transnational actors and 119–143

See also international environmental governance

environmental justice 90

environmental labels.

See eco-labels

Environmental Management and Audit System (EMAS) 171

environmental management systems (EMS) 65, 162, 188

adoption of 179, 180, 181, 234

non-certified, firm-structured 163

environmental networks, transnational 74

environmental NGOs 7, 29–30, 235

co-optation of 29

political behavior of 55–56

environmental performance

assessment of 225–227

information about 181, 225–227, 230–231

levels of 225

measures of 145–146, 166

and shareholder value 233

environmental problems

global nature of 99–100, 187

multi-scalar 90

social and economic causes of, need to address 83

environmental protection, cost of, displacement of populations as 88

Environmental Protection Agency (US) (EPA) 48, 56, 60–61, 103, 144, 155, 158, 172, 223, 228, 230

environmental strategies of companies, cost justifications for 233

environmental values

diffusion of 141

internalization of, by stakeholders 77

See also normative principles

Environment Canada 56

epistemic communities 27, 74, 132

Equal Exchange 203

Equator Principles 128

Ethiopia 199

Europe

corporate governance in 126, 128

negotiated agreements in 61

neocorporatism in 88

ornamental fish trade in 210

sustainable forestry in 195

European Fair Trade Association 204

European Roasterie 207

European Union 50, 205

Euro-Retailer Produce Working Group, EUREP GAP initiative 207

Excel voluntary program 223

experience goods 104

experimental economics 47, 64

externalities 17, 43, 79

Exxon Valdez accident 103

fairness, issues of, and demand for governance 17–18

Fair Trade coffee 214

Fairtrade Foundation (UK) 204

Fairtrade Labelling Organization (FLO) 204, 208

fair trade movements 202–204, 207–208

Fair Trade Organisatie (Dutch) 203

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 166

Federal Express 56

Federation of Fish Collectors in the Philippines (PMP) 210

Fiji 212

financial institutions, international 132

Finca Irlanda 205

Finland 195

firms.

See companies

firm-structured initiatives 163, 172, 180

fish trade, tropical ornamental 208–213

certification in 210–213

forest deterioriation 100, 102, 192–198

Forest Ministers Conference (Helsinki, 1993) 196

Forest Ministers Conference (Lisbon, 1998) 196

forestry 51, 192–198

Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) 29, 51, 65, 138, 193–197

competitor programs 195–197

organizational structure 194

forum shopping 128

fossil fuels 17

Foucault, Michel 84–86

France 200, 204, 205

FreedomCar project 91

free-rider behavior 16, 59, 62, 77, 100, 111, 176, 177, 223

Friedman, Milton 126

Friends of the Earth–UK 193

Fundación Interamericana de Investigación Tropical (FIIT) 206

game theory approach 46, 55, 64

Germany 200

global climate change (GCC) 89–95

adaptation to 92–93

mitigation of 91–92

Global Climate Coalition 127

globalization 73–76

and interdependencies 35

and lack of territoriality 122

postcolonial 87–88

and supply chains 126

Good Wood scheme 193

governance

actor-centered definition of 222–223

“from below,” 82

by civil society 26–28

classic study of 12–13

contemporary views 6, 13–14

defined 119, 221–223

demand for 3, 14–20

as determinant of collective outcomes 13

development of systems of 14

effectiveness of systems of 14, 30–32

evaluation of systems of 30–32

failures of 35–37

global scale of, needed to address sustainable development 4

“good,” normative standards of 32

governance without government 7, 21

and government, distinguished 3, 6, 71, 77, 222

hybrid systems of 3, 6, 8

incentives mechanisms of 223–224

by intergovernmental agreement 23–24

macro-level consequences of 33–35

by non-state actors 7, 24–26, 64, 119–120, 121–124, 141

private 7, 24–26

pure science and applied science approaches 38

research on 6, 21–30, 37–39, 71

as a social function 37

in traditional societies 26–27

See also environmental governance

government

authority of 122

bureaucratically inert, corrupt, or oppressive types of 22

and certification 214

decreasing confidence in 3, 5, 119

environmental challenges to 90

failed 22

failure to address environmental problems 4, 74–75, 99–100, 141, 183, 223

governance by 20–23

and governance, distinguished 3, 6, 71, 77, 222

and individuals 84–86

intervention by 25

outsourcing of functions of 130

“governmentality” (Foucault) 84–86

“green and competitive” claim 231

“green clubs,” benefits to a company of membership in 181

“green” companies 98–99, 230

“green” consumers 77, 232

business responding to 57

developing countries responding to 65

greenhouse gas emissions

and Kyoto Protocol 64

reduction of 91–92

voluntary reductions of 56, 59, 155

Greenpeace 56

“greenwash,” 66

Guatemala 201, 203, 207

Haas, Peter 74

Handling, Husbandry and Transport standard (HHT) 211

Hardin, Garrett 15, 47, 100

Hayek, Friedrich 21

historical process tracing 184–185

Hobbes, Thomas 12, 47

Home Depot 59, 194

horizontal governance networks 82–83

Howard, Sir Albert 204

human actions, impact of, on environment 4

human behavior, models of 113–114

hybrid mechanisms of environmental governance 3, 6, 8, 28–30, 69–70, 73–77, 222–223

dealing with environmental problems 89–95

and distributional inequalities 83

lack of legitimacy of 141

limitations of 80–86

role of NGOs in 139

unequal power relations among the actors 86–89

hypothesis testing 47

idea diffusion 141

India 51

Indiana University: Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis 63

individuals

behavior of, in the absence of governance 15–16

government’s effect on 84–86

individual transferable quotas (ITQs) 15

Indonesia 51, 67–68, 198, 199, 201, 209, 212

industries

certification programs 51–52

common problems of, driving self-regulation 102–104

numbers of firms in, and free-rider problem 59

industry association programs 160–161, 170–171, 177–178, 181

industry associations 24, 57, 62

information

asymmetric 104–105, 108

available to consumers 231–232

available to investors 229–231

from companies 232–235

governance mechanisms based on 229–235

information disclosure

to consumers, investors, and NGOs 224

on environmental performance 181

mandatory programs of 51, 160

voluntary 160

innovation, speed of 74

inspections 53

Institute of Nuclear Power Operation 103, 111

institutional theory 105–107, 109

institutions (rules) 98

nonbinding (no “teeth”) 99

power of, to induce compliance 86

research on 72–73

instrument choice 49–52

insurance companies 108

Integrated Data for Enforcement Analysis System (IDEAS) database 166

interdependencies, and demand for governance 18

interest groups, rent seeking behavior of, regarding use of state power 54

intergovernmental agreements 23–24

intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) 121, 215

distinct interests of 123

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 27, 28

internal self-regulation by firms.

See firm-structured initiatives

International Coffee Agreement 199, 200–202

International Coffee Organization 201–202

international conventions, binding 100

international development agencies 214

international environmental governance

coercive power lacking 47

corporations and 124–130

informal forms of 65

nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and 130–135, 137–143

International Fair Trade Association 204

International Federation for Alternative Trade 204

International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) 205

International Finance Corporation (IFC) 28

International Marinelife Alliance 209, 213

International Network on Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (INECE) 28

international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) 130, 131, 132

relationships with business 129–130

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 28, 101, 144, 162, 188

International Paper 99

international relations

actors in 121–124

role of the private sector 125

top-down approach in analysis of (state as central) 140–141

International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) 192, 215

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) 28

investment, international 125–126, 136

investors, information available to, as basis for responsible investing 229–231

invisible hand 21

iron triangles 5

ISO 9000 (Quality Management System Standard) 106, 110, 111, 162–163, 171, 178–179

ISO 14001 (Environmental Management System Standard) 28, 65, 106, 108–109, 110, 111, 137, 162–163, 171, 178–180, 181, 196, 227, 228

Italy 200

Ivory Coast 199

Japan 26, 61, 171

knowledge, representations of (Foucault) 85

Kropotkin, Peter 12

Kwisthout, Hubert 193

Kyoto Protocol (1997) 24, 64, 91, 127

labels

eco- 51, 108, 115, 193, 206, 222, 223, 231–232

fair trade 203–204

NGO and industry 52

Latin America 198, 206

Latvia 197

lean production practices (“lean is green”) 178

legitimacy.

See authority

less developed countries (LDCs).

See developing countries

Lloyd, William Forster 100

local people

resource management by 63

See also traditional societies

Luxembourg 204

Malaysia 197

Management Institute for the Environment and Business 98

management studies 115

Marine Aquarium Council (MAC) 210–213, 214

Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) 29, 65, 101, 214

market-based environmental governance strategies 76–77

market equilibrium, applied to human behavior 46

markets

in hybrid environmental governance 77–80

social embedding of, by NSMD systems 189

Marx, Karl 13

mass protests 135

Max Havelaar Foundation 203–204

maximizing behavior 45, 54

maximum available control technology (MACT) 59, 158

McDonald’s 29, 56, 99, 138

media, influence of, on public sentiment 67

metal finishing industry 155, 159

Metal Products and Machinery Act 159

Mexico 163, 180, 199, 203, 205, 228

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) 93–94

Millennium Development Goals 4, 29

monitoring/verification 48, 189

Montreal Protocol 64, 99, 158

moral hazard 110

Motion Picture Association of America 100

movie ratings system 100

multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) 5, 23–24

multinational corporations

environmental management systems of 65

and private governance 24

structural power of, from ability to make investments 136–137

See also companies

multi-partner governance 79

“name and shame” tactics 132

Nash, John 46

National Audubon Society 55, 206

National Pollutant Discharge Inventory (Canada) 63

National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) (Canada) 156, 160

National Ski Areas Association 161

nation states

hollowing out and shrinking of 83–84

in hybrid environmental governance 77–80

international agreements among, on environmental matters 64

power of, relative to NGOs 140–141

unable to solve many environmental problems 23, 93

See also countries

natural resources

decentralized governance of 75–76

exploitation of 87–88

inequal allocation of 81

nature, commodification of 81

Nature Conservancy 209

negotiated voluntary agreements 28, 57, 61–62, 66, 222, 227, 228

neoclassical economics 43, 56, 82

neoliberal globalization, harm of, to the environment 189

Nestlé 200

Netherlands 203

New Consumer 204

new institutionalists (New Institutional Economics) 13, 33, 44, 63–66, 72

new public management 131

Niebuhr, Reinhold 37

Nigeria 132, 136

nitrogen oxide 50

nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) 45, 51, 92, 120, 122, 130–135, 135–137, 187

agenda-setting role of 133–134

boycotts by 59, 102, 189

certification programs of 51, 187

and companies, differences 135–137

interactions with companies 120

internal organization of 135, 141

and international environmental governance 130–135, 137–143

maximizing behavior of 45

political spectrum of 131

private politics of, dealing with industries 59, 67

public vs. private 122

reputation and influence of 137–139

research by, impact on public policy 92, 137–138

research on 142

and states, partners with 138–139, 140–141

strategies and survival tactics of 134

three types of (operational, advocacy, and scientific) 130–132

transnational 130

See also international nongovernmental organizations

non-state actors

governance by 119–120, 121–124

and international environmental governance 139–143

power of, with globalization 73–74

public vs. private 122–123

research on 119–120

non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems 183–215

authority of 187–189

certification programs 183, 190–192, 202–208, 214–215

effectiveness of 185

future of 197–198

research on 184–185

rise of, and reasons for 187–189

normative principles

adoption and spreading of 141

companies responding to 224

individuals responding to 15

life-cycle of adoption of 134

See also environmental values

North, Douglass 13

North-South

comparisons 196

relations 87–88, 194

nuclear power industry 103, 111

Nuclear Regulatory Commission 111

open source software 115

operational NGOs 130–131

opportunism 107

Oregon 205

organic agriculture 204–206

government legislation re 205

organic products, consumers’ preference for 232

organizational theory 141

ornamental fish trade.

See fish trade, tropical ornamental

Ostrom, Elinor 44, 63–64, 101

outcome metrics 110

output restrictions 54–55

outsourcing, of governmental functions 130

Oxfam 203

ozone layer, protection of 23, 64, 158

Pan European Forest Certification (PEFC) 195–197

paper and pulp industry 103

partnership programs (EPA) 56

Partnerships for Climate Action 29

“pay to be green” claim 98

penalties, too small 48

performance.

See environmental performance

Pet Industry Cyanide Fact Mission 209

petroleum industry 103

Philip Morris 200

Philippines 209, 210, 212

Pigouvian taxes 43–44

Poland 195

political economy, and environmental policy 54–56

political opportunity structures 133

political science

and environmental concerns 69–97

limited interest in environmental issues, up to now 70

study of governance 37

political systems, virtuous and degenerate phases of (Aristotle) 36

politicians, maximizing behavior of, e.g., for re-election 45, 54

politics, game-theoretic models of 55

pollution

monitoring of 48

non-point sources of 53

as symptomatic of production inefficiencies 57

pollution taxes, vs. output restrictions 54–55

Porter hypothesis 25

postcolonialism 87–88

poststructuralism, critique of “governmentality,” 84–86

Poverty Reduction Strategies 94

power, and subject creation (Foucault) 85–86

“prices vs. quantities” policy choice 49–50

principal-agent framework of analysis 124, 135

private governance 7, 24–26

private–social partnerships 79

privatization 22, 26

process metrics 110

product quality

asymmetric information affecting 104–105

signaling of 104–105, 111

profit, as corporate goal 125, 126, 142

Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) 195

project finance banks 128

Project XL (eXcellence and Leadership) 228

PROPER program (Indonesia) 68

protected areas 192

public disclosure.

See information disclosure

publicity

adverse, against polluters 156

favorable, to companies perceived as environmentally sound 156

public–private partnerships 79

public recognition, as motivator for PVPs 168

public voluntary agreements (PVAs).

See negotiated voluntary agreements

public voluntary programs (PVPs) 57, 60–61, 147–160, 168–170, 181, 228

punishment 47

quality.

See product quality

quality assurance 162

Quality Assurance International 206

Rainforest Action Network 59

Rainforest Alliance 193, 206, 214

Reagonomics 26

realists 13

Rechargeable Battery Recycling Corporation 103

redistributive policy making 84

ReefCheck 211

regimes, international

alternatives to 74

creation of, to address environmental problems 23–24

deficiencies of 74

governance of 64

regulation

enforcement of 47–49, 52–53

influencing, by voluntary self-regulation 59–60

instrument choice in 49–52

international, difficulty of 129

preemption or forestalling of 58, 103–104, 146, 167, 168

relief from 159, 224

stability of 7, 25

threat of 57, 61–62, 66, 86, 111, 127, 158, 227

uncertainty of 228

VEIs as substitute for 144–145

regulators

dissatisfaction with 76

flexibility from, in return for willingness to be environmentally responsible 171, 223–224

maximizing behavior of, balancing consumers and producers 45

“race to the bottom” among 136

voluntary compliance with 60

reporting.

See information disclosure

research and development (R&D), investment in 50–51

resources.

See natural resources

Responsible Care program 59, 100, 104, 107, 110, 111–112, 160–161, 170, 178, 181, 225

Rhine River 23

Rio Summit (UNCED) (1992) 192, 194

Russia 64

sample selection bias, in assessment of environmental performance 226

sanctions

common, against all firms in an industry 102–104

lack of, in VEIs 181–182

scientific NGOs 131–132

self-assessment 161

self-regulation 57–60, 66, 98, 128–129

effectiveness of 109–112

independent monitoring of 110

preemptive (forestalling government regulation) 58

prevalence of, in various industries 100–101

reasons for emergence of 101–105

research on 101, 112

weak enforcement of, and failure of programs 107–109, 110–112

shade-grown coffee 198, 206, 208

Shell 29, 132, 136

shipping industry 108, 111

Sierra Club 55

Ski Area Citizens Coalition 177

skiing industry 108, 161

SmartWood Program 193

Smith, Adam 12

Smith, Vernon 47

Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center (SMBC) 206

social capital 64

in developing countries 67

social changes, and demand for governance 19

social contract 12

socially responsible investing (SRI) 67, 229–231

social movements

objectives of 46

transnational 133

social traps 17

South Africa 205

Spain 200

special interest groups (SIGs) 55

species decline and extinction 28, 192, 206

sprawl 161

stable preferences assumption 46

stakeholders

involvement of 32, 101

taking into account the preferences of 167

state.

See government, nation states

state and local governments (US), pacts between 123

statistical method, in economics 46, 185

Steiner, Rudolph 204

strategic choice perspective, and self-regulation 107–109

Strategic Goals Program 155, 158, 159, 170, 176

subject creation (Foucault) 85–86

subjectivities, changes in 86

sulfur dioxide emissions 50

suppliers in developing countries, held to environmental standards 65

supply chains

globalization and 126

NSMD systems acting on 189

sustainable agriculture 206

Sustainable Coffee Conference, First 206

sustainable development

global action needed for 4

governance for 3, 4, 36, 139

research on 221–238

triple bottom line in 4, 19–20

See also agriculture, forestry

Sustainable Forestry Board 195

Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) 51, 195

Sustainable Slopes program 108, 110, 161, 170, 177

sweatshops 184, 214

Sweden 195, 205

Switzerland 204

symbolic strategies, companies adopting, to avoid real change 145, 225

target dates, meeting, as sign of success 172

taxes

effectiveness of 61

and R&D investment 50

vs. standards, as instrument choice 49–50

technical assistance, to companies 156

Ten Thousand Villages 202

Theory of the Firm 99

third parties, harm to.

See externalities

third party initiatives 162–163, 171, 178–180

third party oversight/audits 161, 162, 179, 181, 206

33/50 Program 60, 61, 155, 158, 160, 168–169, 172, 174–175

Three Mile Island accident 103

timber harvesting 51

toxic chemicals, emissions of 51, 56, 155, 160

Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) 51, 66, 156, 160, 166, 230

tradable emissions permits 50, 52

trade (international), certification programs for products in 187

trademark, registered, of industry association programs 160

traditional societies, governance in 26–27

TRAFFIC (wildlife trade monitoring network) 28

tragedy of the commons 15–16, 47, 63, 100, 223

Traidcraft 203

transaction costs 44, 48

transferable credits 159

transnational activist networks (TANs) 133

transnational actors, and environmental governance 119–143

transnational social movements 133

1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) 158

triple bottom line, and demand for governance 4, 19–20

Tullock, Gordon 54

tuna fishing 102, 104

Twin Trading 203

two-level game concept 123

Type II partnerships 29

Uganda 199

ultimatum game 64

UN Environment Programme 121

Union Carbide 160

United Kingdom.

See Britain

United Nations 132

United Nations Framework Climate Change Convention (UNFCCC) 93, 157

United States

corporate governance in 126

federal environmental legislation 48

inequality in 35

organic movement in 205

privatization in 26

PVPs in 60–61

regulation in 228

rejection of Kyoto Protocol 24, 64

sustainable forestry practices 195

trade in ornamental fish 210, 212

University of Chicago 54–55

US Climate Action Program (USCAP) 29

US Pet Industry 210

Utz Kapeh 207

veto players 82

Vietnam 199

Virginia school of public choice 54–55

voluntary agreements (VAs).

See negotiated voluntary agreements

voluntary environmental initiatives (VEIs) 144–182

effectiveness of 145–146, 163–167, 172–182, 227

lack of sanctioning mechanisms 181–182

participation in 146–147, 163–166, 167–168

symbolic value of participation 145

Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Registry 67

voluntary markets (environmental) 8

voluntary programs for environmental protection (generally) 8, 52, 56–63, 66–67, 77, 104, 127, 155, 225, 226, 227, 228–229

categories of 57

in developing countries 52

reasons for participating in 225, 226, 227

research on 56, 66–67

threat of regulation and 57, 127

vulnerability to global climate change 92–93

Wal-Mart 232

Walt Smith International 212

waste reduction 181

wastewater discharges 159

WasteWise 60

Weitzman, M. 49

West, rise of the 33

wildlife preservation 161

win/win opportunities 98, 155

World Bank 94, 132, 215

World Commission on Dams 140

World Development Movement 204

World Resources Institute 29

world shops 202

World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) (2002) 28

Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) 28, 55, 138, 193, 209, 210, 211, 214

Young, Oran 44, 64–65




© Cambridge University Press
printer iconPrinter friendly versionemail iconEmail a colleague AddThis